AI Teaching ResourcesThis page will provide you with some additional resources on developing your AI syllabus statement and introducing AI into your courses. Developing an AI statement & AI In the classroomIt is important to have a conversation with students regarding how you expect them to use (or not use) AI tools in your course. The guidance you provide should align with other ethical standards expected of students in your course. As of January 2025, there is no official university policy regarding AI use. Faculty are STRONGLY encouraged to include an AI statement in their syllabus and openly inform students of the policy. Sample AI Usage Syllabus StatementsThe following statements are adapted from conversations with a variety of generative AI tools using policies from a variety of universities to jump-start the statements. Several of these statements are found on university websites (noted). Each of these statements can be edited and customized for your coursework and preferences. You may want to consider having policies/statements for each assignment rather than an overall policy. Some instructors simply consider AI use to fall under the University Academic Integrity Policy. This course encourages students to explore the use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools such as ChatGPT for all assignments and assessments. Any such use must be appropriately acknowledged and cited. It is each student’s responsibility to assess the validity and applicability of any GAI output that is submitted; you bear the final responsibility. Violations of this policy will be considered academic misconduct. We draw your attention to the fact that different classes at Harvard could implement different AI policies, and it is the student’s responsibility to conform to expectations for each course. (Source) Students are allowed to use advanced automated tools (artificial intelligence or machine learning tools such as ChatGPT or Dall-E 2) on assignments in this course; no special documentation or citation is required. (Source) Within this class, you are welcome to use foundation models (ChatGPT, GPT, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, Midjourney, GitHub Copilot, and anything after) in a totally unrestricted fashion, for any purpose, at no penalty. However, you should note that all large language models still have a tendency to make up incorrect facts and fake citations, code generation models have a tendency to produce inaccurate outputs, and image generation models can occasionally come up with highly offensive products. You will be responsible for any inaccurate, biased, offensive, or otherwise unethical content you submit regardless of whether it originally comes from you or a foundation model. If you use a foundation model, its contribution must be acknowledged; you will be penalized for using a foundation model without acknowledgement. Having said all these disclaimers, the use of foundation models is encouraged, as it may make it possible for you to submit assignments with higher quality, in less time. The university's policy on plagiarism still applies to any uncited or improperly cited use of work by other human beings, or submission of work by other human beings as your own. (Source) Artificial Intelligence Policy: Are all of our classes now AI classes?A. I expect you to use AI (e.g., ChatGPT, Dall-e-2) in this class. In fact, some assignments
will require it. Learning to use AI is an emerging skill, and I will provide basic
tutorials about how to leverage it for our work. However, be aware of the limits of
these software systems. B. AI is vulnerable to discrimination because it can inadvertently (or intentionally)
perpetuate existing biases present in the data it is trained on. For example, if an
AI system is trained on data that contains a bias against a certain group of people,
the system may make decisions that are unfair or discriminatory towards that group. C. There are several reasons why AI systems can perpetuate discrimination: D. AI can be a valuable tool for augmenting human decision-making and critical thinking, but it is not a replacement. E. AI is a tool, just like a pencil or a computer. However, unlike most tools you
need to acknowledge using it. Pay close attention to whatever information you use
in your own work that is produced from AI, and explain how/what you used at the end
of assignments. My recommendation is to screen shot and save everything (i.e., what
prompts you used, what answers were produced, where, why, and how). This is new territory,
but basic attribution rules still apply. Cite everything, otherwise you are likely
violating academic integrity policies. F. If you provide minimum effort prompts, you will get low quality results. You will
need to refine your prompts to get better outcomes. This will take time and practice. G. Don't trust anything the systems says. Assume it is wrong, unless you already know
the answer and can verify with trusted sources. It works best for topics you deeply
understand. H. Use your best judgment to determine if/where/when to use these tools. They don't
always make products easier and/or better. I. Large language models and chatbots are "look back" machines. They don't advance
knowledge (yet). ChatGPT-3 uses data from 2021 and earlier (a lot has changed since
2021). (Source) I expect you to use AI (ChatGPT and image generation tools, at a minimum), in this class. In fact, some assignments will require it. Learning to use AI is an emerging skill, and I provide tutorials in Canvas about how to use them. I am happy to meet and help with these tools during office hours or after class. Be aware of the limits of ChatGPT: If you provide minimum effort prompts, you will get low quality results. You will need to refine your prompts in order to get good outcomes. This will take work. Don’t trust anything it says. If it gives you a number or fact, assume it is wrong unless you either know the answer or can check in with another source. You will be responsible for any errors or omissions provided by the tool. It works best for topics you understand. AI is a tool, but one that you need to acknowledge using. Please include a paragraph at the end of any assignment that uses AI explaining what you used the AI for and what prompts you used to get the results. Failure to do so is in violation of the academic honesty policies. Be thoughtful about when this tool is useful. Don’t use it if it isn’t appropriate for the case or circumstance. (Source) Examples of AI Mixed PoliciesThese are Generative AI technologies that I use on a regular basis in my discipline: [example 1], [example 2], and [example 3]. I am giving you permission to use them in this class. If you come across something else that I'm unaware of, let me know so we can discuss its use in the class. Certain assignments in this course will permit or even encourage the use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools such as ChatGPT. The default is that such use is disallowed unless otherwise stated. Any such use must be appropriately acknowledged and cited. It is each student’s responsibility to assess the validity and applicability of any GAI output that is submitted; you bear the final responsibility. Violations of this policy will be considered academic misconduct. We draw your attention to the fact that different classes at Harvard could implement different AI policies, and it is the student’s responsibility to conform to expectations for each course. (Source) Large language models, such as ChatGPT (chat.openai.com) are rapidly changing the tools available to people writing code. Given their use out in the world, the view we will take in this class is that it does not make sense to ban the use of such tools in our problem sets or projects. For now, here is my guidance on how these can and should be used in our class: First and foremost, note that output from ChatGPT can often be confidently wrong! Run your code and check any output to make sure that this actually works. Such AI assistants will give you a good first guess, but these are really empowering for users who invest in being able to tell when the output is correct or not.If you use ChatGPT or similar resources, credit it at the top of your problem set as you would a programming partner.Where you use direct language or code from ChatGPT, please cite this as you would information taken from other sources more generally. (Andrew Zeitlin, McCourt) (Source) You may use AI programs e.g. ChatGPT to help generate ideas and brainstorm. However, you should note that the material generated by these programs may be inaccurate, incomplete, or otherwise problematic. Beware that use may also stifle your own independent thinking and creativity. You may not submit any work generated by an AI program as your own. If you include material generated by an AI program, it should be cited like any other reference material (with due consideration for the quality of the reference, which may be poor). Any plagiarism or other form of cheating will be dealt with severely under relevant Penn policies. (Source) Policy on the use of generative artificial intelligence tools: Using an AI-content generator such as ChatGPT to complete assignment without proper attribution violates academic integrity. By submitting assignments in this class, you pledge to affirm that they are your own work and you attribute use of any tools and sources. Learning to use AI responsibly and ethically is an important skill in today’s society. Be aware of the limits of conversational, generative AI tools such as ChatGPT.
Here are approved uses of AI in this course. You can take advantage of a generative AI to:
(Source) A Few Words about Generative AI (e.g. ChatGPT) Writing is integral to thinking. It is also hard. Natural language processing (NLP) applications like ChatGPT or Sudowrite are useful tools for helping us improve our writing and stimulate our thinking. However, they should never serve as a substitute for either. And, in this course, they cannot. Think of the help you get from NLP apps as a much less sophisticated version of the assistance you can receive (for free!) from a Bentley Writing Center tutor. That person might legitimately ask you a question to jump-start your imagination, steer you away from the passive voice, or identify a poorly organized paragraph, but should never do the writing for you. A major difference here, of course, is that an NLP app is not a person. It’s a machine which is adept at recognizing patterns and reflecting those patterns back at us. It cannot think for itself. And it cannot think for you. With that analogy in mind, you will need to adhere to the following guidelines in our class. Appropriate use of AI when writing essays or discussion board entries:
Inappropriate use of AI when writing essays or discussion board entries:
Evidence of inappropriate AI use will be grounds for submission of an Academic Integrity report. Sanctions will range from a zero for the assignment to an F for the course. I’m assuming we won’t have a problem in this regard but want to make sure that the expectations are clear so that we can spend the semester learning things together—and not worrying about the origins of your work. Be aware that other classes may have different policies and that some may forbid AI use altogether. (Source)
Sample AI Usage Syllabus StatementsGeneral(not course/university specific)Use of AI Tools: This course requires you to complete various assignments that assess your understanding and application of the course content. You are expected to do your own work and cite any sources you use properly. You are not allowed to use any artificial intelligence (AI) tools, such as chatbots, text generators, paraphrasers, summarizers, or solvers, to complete any part of your assignments. Any attempt to use these tools will be considered academic misconduct and will be dealt with according to the university’s academic integrity policy. Students are expected to complete all work independently and without the assistance of AI-generated content. If you have any questions about what constitutes acceptable use of AI tools, please consult with the instructor before submitting your work. Use of AI Tools: This course permits you to use artificial intelligence (AI) tools, such as chatbots, text generators, paraphrasers, summarizers, or solvers, to get guidance on assignments, as long as you do so in an ethical and responsible manner. Essentially, you can think of these tools as ways to help you learn but not to entirely create work for assignments like discussion board posts, essays, presentation slides, and so on. AI is more like your tutor or TA, not a replacement for your independent thinking. This means that you must:
You are accountable for any mistakes or errors made by the AI tool. Always check and edit the output before submitting your work. If you discover any inaccuracies or inconsistencies in the output after submission, notify the instructor immediately and correct them as soon as possible. Using AI tools in an unethical or irresponsible manner, such as copying or paraphrasing the output without citation or transparency, using the output as your own work without verification or integration, or using the output to misrepresent your knowledge or skills, is considered a form of academic dishonesty and will result in a zero grade for the assignment and possible disciplinary action. If you have any questions about what constitutes ethical and responsible use of AI tools, please consult with the instructor before submitting your work. NOTE: Some instructors will also list specific acceptable and unacceptable uses or include a statement like “All written assignments, projects, and exams must be completed independently.” Use of AI Tools: In this course, students are encouraged to explore and utilize generative AI tools, such as chatbots, text generators, paraphrasers, etc., as part of their learning and coursework. These tools can be valuable for brainstorming, drafting, and enhancing your understanding of the material. However, it is important to critically assess and cite any AI-generated content used in your assignments and projects. Students are expected to demonstrate their own understanding and critical thinking in their final submissions. Proper attribution and transparency about your usage of an AI tool are expected. We may also integrate AI Tools into some of our assignments. Here are some examples of ethical and responsible generative AI use.
If you have any questions about what constitutes ethical and responsible use of AI tools, please consult with the instructor before submitting your work. Questions to Consider When Developing Your Own AI Syllabus Statement
Additional Example Syllabus Statements
Discussing the Ethics of AI Use With Students
More Questions for DiscussionConsider having a discussion with students and creating some course norms and guidelines together.
Ideas for Activities
Guidance for Citing AI Tools |